A number of our foregoing factors offer credence into assertion one to metaphor is a keen analogous title. This might be corroborated by the St Thomas’ techniques under consideration 13 regarding brand new Prima Pars , as during the blog post around three, as he asks or no name’s said safely regarding Goodness, the latest resistance put into the gamble try between usage proprie and you will improprie into second identified that have metaphor. Up coming, inside post six, as he asks in the event the brands common in order to Jesus and creatures is actually very first said regarding animals, the fresh new change proprie/improprie is apparently an excellent subdivision away from analogous identity. St Thomas initiate because of the saying that “from inside the omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur per respectum ad unum: ainsi que ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur during the definitione omnium. Et quia ratio quam significat nomen for every single prius dicitur de eo quod ponitur during the definitione aliorum, et each posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant offer illud primum vel magis vel without.” This will be exemplified because of the dated proceed this site reliable, “fit.” “Sic hence omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur per prius de- creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud significant quam similitudines ad stories creaturas.” St. Thomas sees this new resemblance out of ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) required in “cheerful meadow” plus in getting in touch with God a good lion.
As he goes on to talk from other labels “quae low metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,” the fresh new clear feeling is that they are talking off most other era regarding analogous names than metaphors
Were there messages in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and example? When we consider the new responses for the Metaphysics , we find St Thomas pinpointing “potency” with the analogous and you can equivocal modes. “Potency” form several things. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum ad quosdam analogiae.” The latest equivocal settings of potency try exemplified by the way i talk about step 3 towards 3rd strength and of the brand new cube because strength of line. “Et propter hoc per quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens inside the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens into the rem” Once again an effective proportionality see. These equivocal modes are indeed metaphors is obvious throughout the synchronous passage in-book Delta during the commenting on which St Thomas starts, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes such methods metaphorical and never analogical? “His for this reason modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur offer unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, et omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur ad aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In a nutshell, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor so you can analogous spends off a reputation just like the second rather than the previous involve a reduction so you’re able to what is actually mostly denominated because of the keyword at issue while, will be they need mentioning, on the text message of one’s Summa i considered a second before, brand new metaphor wasn’t notable about expansion proprie on this subject base. Or perhaps is it the manner of your own regard to what exactly is principally signifed from the name hence differentiates metaphor away from example, utilize proprie off improprie ? Anything called metaphorically is actually, whatsoever, delivered to getting just like precisely what the term properly signifies.
Whatever you will be shopping for is a few way of justifying the new pretty preferred variation away from metaphor and analogy in a way that zero attention was designed to Cajetan’s department away from analogy toward attribution and you will proper proportionality
A keen aporia features demonstrably emerged, for this reason, as well as solution can simply getting had by choosing just what a metaphor are and you may just what an analogous name is. Remedies for this type of questions should enable me to comprehend the appear to contradictory comments of Aquinas.
